Bukata v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hutchison, J.:
The appeal in this case is taken by the defendant insurance company from the order of the trial court overruling its demurrer to the petition of plaintiff in an action to recover an addi*859tional portion of a life insurance policy on account of the death of the insured being accidental by a heat stroke or heat prostration. The appellant states that the one question involved in the appeal is as follows: “Is death resulting from being stricken with heat stroke or heat prostration as alleged, death occurring in consequence of bodily injury…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bryant v. Continental Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1916
- Richards v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- Higgins v. Midland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1917
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burns v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
- Mitchell v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
- Spence v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
- Mandles v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Raley v. Life & Casualty Insurance Co. of TennesseeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.