Legal Opinion

Cole v. Oatman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1926No. Docket No. 58PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

On February 24, 1923, plaintiffs purchased from defendant on a land contract a farm of 200 acres in Muskegon county, and the live stock, tools and implements thereon, at an agreed price of $10,000; payable, $1,000 on delivery of the contract, and balance in deferred payments. On April 8,1924, they brought this action to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by them, due to the false and fraudulent representations made by defendant as to the condition and value of the farm and the personal property. They had verdict and judgment in the sum of $1,000. The defendant had moved for a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. St. John v. HendricksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Draft v. HesselsweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Barnhardt v. HamelMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Parkyn v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Parkyn v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rankin v. BiggerNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gross v. MoroskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Speath v. Merchants' Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Meemic Insurance Company v. Louise M FortsonMichigan Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API