Parkyn v. Ford
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Hillsdale; Weimer, J., presiding. Case by Joseph O. Parkyn and others against Julius C. Ford for fraud in an exchange of real estate. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
On March 11, 1913, plaintiffs exchanged their Hillsdale county farm for defendant’s farm lying near Summit, Mississippi. In so doing defendant assumed the mortgage of $3,544 on the Hillsdale farm and plaintiffs gave him a mortgage for a like amount on the Mississippi farm. Defendant also sold plaintiffs a quantity of personal farm property for which they agreed to pay $1,500. Soon after the exchange, the parties went into possession of their respective properties, and plaintiffs resided on the Mississippi farm until September, 1913, when they returned to Hillsdale and filed a bill praying for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Simon v. Goodyear Metallic Rubber Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
- St. John v. HendricksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Nounnan v. Sutter County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Draft v. HesselsweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ambrose v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Monroe v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Cole v. OatmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Fowler v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- George Realty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.