Legal Opinion

St. John v. Hendrickson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1882No. 9207PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Front the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

By sifting the complaint of the appellee, and leaving out of consideration the mere matters of inducement and redundancy, we have the following material allegations : That the appellants were partners doing business under the style of “ The Lone Tree Medicine Company; ” that, to induce the appellee to invest in said partnership eight hundred dollars, they falsely represented to him that they each had invested therein the sum of eight hundred dollars, except St. John, whose skill in compounding the remedies which were manufactured and sold by the Medicine Company was estimated at that sum;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Love v. OldhamIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. McQueen v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1851

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Scott v. Bodor, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Nysewander v. LowmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Pryor v. . FosterNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  5. Board of Water Commissioners v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API