Legal Opinion

Draft v. Hesselsweet

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1917No. Docket No. 81PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Oceana; Sullivan, J. Bill by Louis Draft against Francis Hesselsweet. ' administrator of the estate of Oscar Klotter, and others, to foreclose a mortgage. Defendants filed an an.'swer in the nature of a cross-bill asking for rescission of the contract. From a decree for defendants canceling the mortgage, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

This bill is filed to foreclose a purchase-price mortgage on an 80-acre fruit farm in Oceana county, upon which there is claimed to be due upwards of $3,900. The mortgagor, Oscar Klotter, and his *605wife, Katherine, filed their answer and cross-bill, charging that they were induced by the fraudulent representations of complainant and his agent to purchase the premises, and that they were thereby defrauded. They prayed for a rescission of the contract. The other parties defendant were interested in the premises as mortgagees. The chancellor refused to grant complainant any relief and refused to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ruhl v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Hubbardston Lumber Co. v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Lee v. McClellandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hurt v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Mulheron v. Henry S. Koppin Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Bowen v. StocklinMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Bayley v. FriedbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Monroe v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Dorgan v. BirneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API