Legal Opinion

Parkyn v. Ford

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1916No. Docket No. 29PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Hillsdale; Knowlen, J., presiding. Bill by Joseph O. Parkyn and others against Julius C. Ford for the rescission of an exchange of real estate on the ground of fraud. From a decree for complainants, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

Plaintiffs were the owners of 93 acres of farm lands lying near the city of Hillsdale. Defendant, at the same time, was the owner of a farm of 288 *185acres, situate near Summit, in the State of Mississippi. Defendant advertised his farm for sale, and the advertisement came to the attention of plaintiff Joseph O. Parkyn, and he wrote to defendant, making numerous inquiries concerning the farm. These inquiries were replied to by defendant, and further correspondence was had, but nothing came of it. A few months later the correspondence was renewed by Parkyn, and several letters passed between…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Lee v. McClellandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Draft v. HesselsweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Monroe v. HoffmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Parkyn v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Cole v. OatmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Doukas v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API