Legal Opinion

Yeamans v. Snook

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided January 16, 1979No. Civil No. 226-1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

memorandum and order

This is an action for false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and deprivation of civil rights. It is presently before the court on a “slew” of motions by the parties. Defendants Snook and McCants move for summary judgment on plaintiff’s original complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. Plaintiff moves to strike an allegation contained in the memorandum of law of Snook and McCants in support of their motion for summary judgment on the ground that the said allegation is impertinent and scandalous. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f). Plaintiff also moves to amend her complaint…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Robinson v. McCorkleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  5. Powers v. CarvalhoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mercer v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1982
  2. Deary v. EvansDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1983
  3. Harley ex rel. Harley v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1982
  4. Van Putten v. AlexisDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1982
  5. Charleswell v. Bank of Nova ScotiaSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API