Legal Opinion
Charleswell v. Bank of Nova Scotia
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands
Decided May 1, 2001No. Civil No. 605/96PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodge, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(May 1, 2001)
Before the Court is Defendant The Bank of Nova Scotia’s (“Scotiabank”) Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons set forth below, the Defendant’s Motion shall be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
Facts
Defendant Scotiabank employed Plaintiff as a bank teller in a branch office in St. Thomas, Virgin Islands. Plaintiff worked for the bank from June 1990 until January 1995 when she voluntarily resigned to complete *39her studies at the University of the Virgin Islands. On January 10, 1995, after Plaintiff…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Luttrell v. United Telephone System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1984
- Burt v. FerreseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Isidor Paiewonsky Associates, Inc. v. Sharp Properties, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Illaraza v. Hovensa LLCDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2014
- Palisoc v. PobleteSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Airlines Reporting Corp. v. BelfonDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2004
- POLEON v. GOVERNMENT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDSDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2018