State v. Ruskin

A consideration of the errors complained of herein requires the determination of two points. First, whether the record discloses that the correct rule has been applied as to the evidence suffic ient to support the judgment of conviction of subornation of perjury; and, second, whether there is sufficient evidence of a substantive nature to sustain the verdict of the jury that an oath was duly and legally administered to the witness Albert Dean, whose testimony is claimed to have been suborned.

There is a distinction between the crime of perjury and that of subornation of perjury; and we deem…