State v. Renswick
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was convicted in the district court for Wright county of the crime of subornation of perjury. From the judgment of conviction, and from an order,_ Giddings, J., denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of subornation of perjury in the district court of the county of Wright, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state’s prison for the term of two and one-half years. He appealed from the judgment.
The indictment charged that the defendant wilfully and feloniously induced and procured Mrs. Frances Janikula, then an unmarried woman, to go before a justice of the peace in proceedings in *20bastardy, and falsely to swear to a complaint in writing that Thomas Janikula was the father of her unborn child.
The completed crime of subornation of perjury consists of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- State v. PearceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State ex rel. Thurston v. SargentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by25 opinions
- People v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Mundy v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.