Legal Opinion

State v. Gleason

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1935No. 5498PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Justice.

Defendant was convicted of subornation of perjury and appeals. The alleged errors relied on for a reversal of the judgment are these: (1) That the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict; (2) that the trial judge erroneously “cross-examined certain witnesses of the defendant as to material and immaterial facts * * * which indicated to the jury the Court’s opinion as to the credibility” of the witnesses to the prejudice of defendant; and (8) that the making of certain remarks by the trial judge “to defendant’s counsel was prejudicial to the defendant in the minds of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. State v. KeehnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. State v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. State v. PearceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Commonwealth v. BillingsleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  3. Marrone v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. KallasUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Commonwealth v. HopkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API