Legal Opinion
State v. Bixby
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 14, 1947No. 29663PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMallery, C. J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of subornation of perjury. His motion for a dismissal for insufficiency of the evidence at the close of the state’s case was denied. Motions for a directed verdict, in arrest of judgment, for a new trial, and for a suspended judgment were likewise denied, whereupon the defendant appeals.
Subornation of perjury is defined in Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2360 [P.P.C. § 118-19], as follows:
“Every person who shall willfully procure another to commit perjury, in either degree, or to offer any false evidence, shall be guilty of subornation of perjury and shall be…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Hammer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- State Ex Rel. Haugland v. SmytheWashington Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. FrahmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Long v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1888
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- People v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. TippettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- State v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- State v. SalasWashington Supreme Court · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.