Legal Opinion
Fine Airport Parking, Inc. v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 11, 2003No. 96,748PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDREAU, Justice.
¶ 1 Fine Airport Parking, Inc. (Fine) appealed the district court’s dismissal of its state antitrust cause of action against the City of Tulsa and its public authorities, the Tulsa Airport Authority and the Tulsa Airports Improvement Trust (collectively Tulsa). The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the district court erred in dismissing Fine’s petition. The appeal presents two underlying questions: 1) Is the federal doctrine of state action immunity incorporated into the Oklahoma Antitrust Reform Act, 79 O.S.2001, §§ 201, et seq. and 2) Is Tulsa’s operation of an…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Town of Hallie v. City of Eau ClaireSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Miller's Pond Co., LLC v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Summit Water Distribution Co. v. Summit CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Brownsburg Community School Corp. v. Natare Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Kinslow Round-Up Inc. v. City of SeminoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- In Re De-Annexation of Certain Real PropertySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.