Legal Opinion
Miller's Pond Co., LLC v. City of New London
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 7, 2005No. SC 17166PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that the defendants, the city of New London (city), the New London water and water pollution control authority (New London water authority), the town of Waterford, and the Waterford water pollution control authority (Waterford water authority), are immune from antitrust liability under General Statutes § 35-31 (b)1 because their alleged anticompetitive activities were “specifically directed or required” by statute with respect to the wholesale water market in the New London area. The…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Ramirez v. Health Net of the Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- In re William D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Greco v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. Marsh and McLennan Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Carquest of Hot Springs, Inc. v. General Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.