Legal Opinion

Brownsburg Community School Corp. v. Natare Corp.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2005No. 49S02-0409-CV-406PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

We hold that the Indiana Antitrust Act does not create a civil treble damage remedy against an arm of government.

Factual and Procedural Background

The following facts are alleged in the complaint. We take them as true for purposes of this interlocutory appeal of the denial of a motion by a defendant for judgment on the pleadings. 1

The School Corporation undertook a building project for Brownsburg High School that included a fine arts addition and a swimming pool. The School Corporation hired Schmidt Associates as its architect, and Schmidt retained Spear Corporation as a pool…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. ESPN, Inc. and Paula Lavigne v. University of Notre Dame Police DepartmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Cantrell v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Sheet Metal Workers Local 441 Health & Welfare Plan v. Glaxosmithkline, PLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Midwest Psychological Center, Inc. v. Indiana Department of AdministrationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API