Grammatico v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 In 1999, the legislature amended Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-1021 to provide that if an employer implements a drug-free workplace policy, a worker who suffers a workplace injury and subsequently tests positive for alcohol impairment or illegal drug use is not eligible for workers’ compensation benefits unless one of three exceptions applies. A.R.S. § 23-1021(D) (Supp.2003). In this special action, we are asked to decide whether this provision violates Article 18, Section 8, of the Arizona Constitution by depriving workers of compensatory benefits…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Aitken v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- PFS v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- King v. Alabam's Freight Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Polanco v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Engler v. Gulf Interstate Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- In Re Leopoldo L.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Keovorabouth v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.