Legal Opinion

In Re Leopoldo L.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 21, 2004No. 1 CA-JV 04-0074PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 Leopoldo L. appeals the juvenile court’s disposition order that he submit to deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) testing. He argues that the court erred in entering this order because (1) Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 13-610(O)(1) (Supp.2003), which authorizes DNA testing of juveniles adjudicated delinquent for sexual offenses, is inapplicable to adjudications for attempted sexual offenses, and (2) the involuntary taking of a DNA sample under § 13-610 is an unreasonable search that violates his federal and state constitutional rights to privacy. For the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. GarvinIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. Lakisha M.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. F. v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Mario W. v. Hon. kaipio/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API