Keovorabouth v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission of Arizona (“ICA”) award and decision upon review for a non-eompensable claim. Petitioner employee Khamtamh Keovorabouth argues that her injuries sustained in an automobile accident while traveling to her attorney’s office to prepare for her deposition in a pending ICA proceeding are compensable. We find this case is controlled by Whitington v. Industrial Commission, 105 Ariz. 567, 468 P.2d 926 (1970), and we conclude that her injuries did not arise out of and in the course of employ ment. We therefore…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- DeSchaaf v. Indus. Com'n of Ariz.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Finnegan v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Grammatico v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Engler v. Gulf Interstate Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Mudas Greenhouses, LLC v. Global Horticultural, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Carnes v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Feiereisen v. Newpage Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Holsapple v. Union Pacific R. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.