State ex rel. Corron v. Wisner
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.
Even though the appellants have shown that the appellees did not comply in full with the applicable *162statutes with regard to the assessment of taxes for the year 1969 (R. C. 5715.16 and 5715.17), the initial question before this court is whether or not the appellants chose the correct remedy.
It is fundamental that a writ of mandamus will not be granted where the persons seeking the writ have an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law including both legal and equitable remedies. See State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St. 2d 141, the tenth paragraph of the syllabus of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by11 opinions
- State ex rel. Hodges v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Satow v. Gausse-MillikenOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. Walker v. City of Bowling GreenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Cunningham v. Amer Cunningham Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Iris Sales Co. v. VoinovichOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.