Legal Opinion
ANTRIM LUMBER COMPANY v. Bowline
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 14, 1969No. 41677PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Justice.
This appeal involves judgments recovered by the defendant in error, Ray Bowline, doing business as Bowline Construction Company (hereinafter called the plaintiff), in an action for judgment for the balance claimed to be due him as the contractor under a construction contract, and to have the same declared to, and foreclosed as, a valid mechanic’s and material-man’s lien, and for judgment on a bond for attorney fee, interest and court costs.
His action arose out of a written contract (hereinafter called the “base contract”) that was entered into, as of August 1, 1962, between…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Okmulgee Producing & Refining Co. v. BaughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Flour Mills of America, Inc. v. American Steel Building Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Garrett v. KennedySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- City of Lawton v. Sherman MacHine & Iron WorksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Mayer v. East Side Logging Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Morgan v. Galilean Health Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- PUMMILL v. HANCOCK EXPLORATION LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- Cook v. Oklahoma Board of Public AffairsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Morgan v. Galilean Health Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.