Legal Opinion
Canal Insurance Co. v. Tate
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 25, 1965No. 40918PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
The exception to the overruling of the general demurrer has been abandoned.
The special demurrer attacks the failure of the plaintiff *380to attach a copy of the insurance contract to the petition. Code § 81-105 (Ga. L. 1887, p. 64) provides, in part, that “copies of contracts . . . should be incorporated in or attached to the petition in all cases in which they constitute the cause of action, or the relief prayed for must be based thereon. In suits to recover money on an insurance policy it shall be necessary to attach a copy of only what appears upon the face or in the body of the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. BuckCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Jones v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Dixon v. Bristol Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Bankers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Gresham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Jerrell Powell and Mrs. Sally Bargeron v. Lititz Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Vines v. Citizens Trust BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. GuessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Johnson v. MannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.