Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Snyder

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 24, 1972No. 46854PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

The direction of a verdict is proper only where there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict. Code Ann. §81A-150 (a). A verdict may only he directed in situations where, if there were a determination the other way, it would have to be set aside by the court. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. Winget, 197 F2d 97 (34 ALR2d 250). It is only where reasonable men may not differ as to the inferences to be drawn from the evidence that it is proper for the judge to remove the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Canal Insurance Co. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Bennett v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Hill v. Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. Isom v. SchettinoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Megar v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  5. Curl v. FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION OF GAINESVILLESupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API