Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Mann

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 18, 1974No. 49374PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, Judge.

"The direction of a verdict is proper only where there is no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict. Code Ann. § 81A-150 (a). . . It is only where reasonable men may not differ as to the inferences to be drawn from the evidence that it is proper for the judge to remove the case from jury consideration. Canal Ins. Co. v. Tate, 111 Ga. App. 377 (141 SE2d 851).” State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Snyder, 125 Ga. App. 352 (187 SE2d 878); Powell v. Ferguson Tile &c. Co.,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Powell v. Ferguson Tile & Terrazzo Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. Canal Insurance Co. v. TateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Treat Orchard Co. v. General Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pembrook Management, Inc. v. CossaboonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. Speir v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Williams v. RunionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Crooks v. CrimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API