Legal Opinion

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. IMR Capital Corp.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided May 10, 1995No. Civ. A. 90-12866-NG, 92-10919-NGPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND DECISION

GERTNER, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This is yet another chapter in the multivolume saga of litigation which has arisen out of the break-up of the Bell System and the deregulation of the telephone industry. The subject of this episode is “Consumer Owned Coin Operated Telephones,” better known in the industry as “COCOTs.” A COCOT is a type of coin-operated pay telephone. Unlike most pay telephones, which are owned by the Local Exchange Carrier (“LEC”), 1 COCOTs are owned by third parties, which must gain access to the telephone grid through the LEC. Because LECs also…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tenore v. AT&T Wireless ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Gibbs v. SLM Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  3. Union Telephone Co. v. Wyoming Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. In Re America Online, Inc. Version 5.0 Software LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
  5. Berenson v. National Financial Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API