Legal Opinion
Tenore v. AT&T Wireless Services
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 10, 1998No. 65609-6PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
Appellants Coryelle Tenore, Charles F. Peterson and Karen M. Cole, on behalf of themselves and all *326others similarly situated, seek direct review of a judgment of the King County Superior Court which dismissed their class action lawsuit on a Civil Rule (CR) 12(b)(6) motion based upon federal preemption of state law claims under 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(3)(A) and the doctrine of primary jurisdiction. We granted review. We reverse the trial court.
QUESTION PRESENTED
The question presented is whether the trial court was correct in dismissing Appellants’ state law claims on a CR 12(b)(6) motion based upon…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings Bd.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
- Postema v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Burton v. LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Kumar v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
- FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2014
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.