Legal Opinion
Branzel v. City of Concord
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 8, 1966No. Civ. 22969PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.
In this wrongful death action, defendant City of Concord (City) appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs and against City in the sum of $41,000. The same jury returned a verdict in favor of defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and against plaintiffs. Plaintiffs have not appealed from the adverse judgment entered on this verdict.
Plaintiffs are the wife and children of decedent Clarence Matthew Branzel. On the afternoon of March 13, 1961 the Branzels—Clarence, Eleanor, his wife, and Major 1 his son, then 16 years old, went to an area maintained by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Gray v. BrinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Teall v. City of CudahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Hawk v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bonanno v. Central Contra Costa Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- De La Rosa v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Sumner Peck Ranch, Inc. v. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1993
- Holmes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bakity v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.