Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Kantel

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1954No. Civ. 19990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

This action was instituted by plaintiff to establish his right to a right of way and easement over land owned by defendants Fred Kantel and Alice Kantel, and to recover damages for wrongful destruction of and interference with the alleged right of way by defendants.

Facts: Plaintiff owns a 60-acre piece of land located about a mile from Pine Canyon Road, which is the nearest public highway in the vicinity. A road runs from plaintiff’s land oyer the lands owned by defendants to Pine Canyon Road. Shortly after defendants took possession of their land in the latter part of 1949, defendant Fred…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. GreggCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Lori, Ltd. v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Washington v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of National City v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. Coast Pump Associates v. Stephen Tyler Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Paramount Rock Co., Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API