Legal Opinion

City of National City v. California Water & Telephone Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1962No. Civ. 6756PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

The City of National City, plaintiff and respondent herein, ordered the improvement of one of its streets, i.e., Highland Avenue between Fourth and Eighth Streets, which necessitated the relocation of the water distribution facilities therein owned by the California Water and Telephone Company, the defendant and appellant herein. The relocation was effected under an agreement which, in substance, provided that the cost thereof should be borne as determined by a court of competent jurisdiction. Thereupon the plaintiff brought this action to obtain such determination. The defendant answered;…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blank v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Martin v. KehlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Contempo Construction Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. James v. P.C.S. Ginning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API