Legal Opinion
Lori, Ltd. v. Wolfe
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 16, 1948No. Civ. 15572PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J. pro tem.
Plaintiffs sued defendants Wolfe seeking to reform a lease. The lease is dated February 15, 1944. It did not contain any provision against assignment or subletting. Plaintiffs sought, by their complaint filed April 26, 1945, to reform the lease by having a provision against assignment and subletting included. Defendants Wolfe answered, denying the principal allegations of the complaint and alleging that on April 10, 1945, they had transferred their interest, as lessees, to Heeht and Salomon, who were then in possession, and pleaded that the action should be abated until…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Hanes v. CoffeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Fuller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Howe v. Pioneer Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Cunningham v. Universal UnderwritersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.