Burdette v. Rollefson Construction Co.
California Supreme Court
1DissentMcCOMB, J.
I dissent. The majority opinion, in my view, reaches an anomalous result.
First, it is conceded by the plaintiff in the agreed statement of fact that there is no evidence in the entire record showing or tending to show the cause of plaintiff’s injuries.
Second, the record discloses a total absence of any evidence as to how the accident occurred. The record merely reveals that plaintiff testified that “she stepped out of the door on to the platform, turned so that she faced the door, and claims that the last thing she remembers is pulling the door closed. She claims that the next thing she knew…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Puckhaber v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Nunneley v. Edgar HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Rancho Santa Margarita v. VailCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.