Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Bishop

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 27, 1995No. 9109-66969; CA A85093PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Wife appeals from a judgment terminating her former husband’s spousal support obligation because she had begun living with her boyfriend. She also appeals from a supplemental judgment awarding husband attorney fees and costs. We affirm.

The parties were divorced, after a 15-year marriage, in May 1992. At that time, husband earned $51,600 per year, and wife earned approximately $24,000 per year. The dissolution court ordered husband to pay spousal support to wife of $600 per month for three years, and $250 in the fourth year. Wife was granted custody of the parties’ minor child.

In October 1993,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Marriage of HoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. In re the Marriage of GradyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. In re the Marriage of BlivenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of RubeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. In re the Marriage of JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. In Re the Marriage of UhdeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. In re PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API