Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Jones

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 31, 2001No. 97-DO-0594-AB; CA A108877PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Husband appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for reduction or termination of his $517 monthly indefinite spousal support obligation. ORS 107.135. He contends that the trial court erroneously excluded evidence of the parties’ current and marital standards of living. He also argues that the trial court did not properly consider the effect of wife’s remarriage and her new spouse’s income in evaluating whether there had been a substantial change of circumstances. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and modify the judgment.

The parties were married for 12 years and their marriage was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Marriage of HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. In re the Marriage of BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. In re the Marriage of Ganger & LittleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. In re the Marriage of HoagCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. In re the Marriage of JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API