Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Rubey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 2000No. 95-1428-D-3; CA A102950PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

Husband appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to terminate spousal support. He argues that, since wife’s remarriage, there has been a substantial change of circumstances that ehminates the need for any farther spousal support. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and reverse and remand.

The parties met in 1979, while husband was employed at 3M and wife was a college student. They lived together for two years and were married in 1981. At the time of the marriage, wife was within a few credits of completing her college education but did not do so. The couple’s first child was bom in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In re the Marriage of HallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. Matter of Marriage of HoagCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. In re the Marriage of BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of TilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. In re the Marriage of MoserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. In Re the Marriage of FrostCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. In re the Marriage of DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. In re the Marriage of JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API