Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Uhde

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 2007No. 010361; A130945PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Wife appeals, and husband conditionally cross-appeals, from a judgment of dissolution of marriage. Wife asserts that the trial court erred in denying her an award of maintenance spousal support, in requiring her to be solely responsible for transporting the parties’ children for her parenting time, and in denying her request for attorney fees. On cross-appeal, husband argues that, if wife is awarded spousal support on appeal, she should be required to pay child support. Although we affirm the trial court’s decision with respect to transportation for parenting time, we conclude that the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Marriage of HoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Proctor v. MavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. In re the Marriage of AshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of VaughnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of UhdeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API