In re the Marriage of Ho
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
pro tempore.
Husband appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a judgment of dissolution to eliminate spousal support. The trial court dismissed the motion at the close of his evidence on the basis that he had not shown a substantial change of circumstances since the original judgment. We reverse and remand.
Husband’s evidence showed that, at the time of the dissolution of this 17-year marriage in 1979, wife was unemployed and had not worked outside the home for some time. Husband was and is a physician. The parties had four children. Custody was divided, with the oldest son living…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- In re the Marriage of WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of VaughnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of BoniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- In re the Marriage of BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- In re the Marriage of Ganger & LittleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- In re the Marriage of MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- In re the Marriage of BlivenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.