Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Ho

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1988No. 79-2-126; CA A46168PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

pro tempore.

Husband appeals from an order denying his motion to modify a judgment of dissolution to eliminate spousal support. The trial court dismissed the motion at the close of his evidence on the basis that he had not shown a substantial change of circumstances since the original judgment. We reverse and remand.

Husband’s evidence showed that, at the time of the dissolution of this 17-year marriage in 1979, wife was unemployed and had not worked outside the home for some time. Husband was and is a physician. The parties had four children. Custody was divided, with the oldest son living…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In re the Marriage of WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of VaughnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of BoniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. In re the Marriage of BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. In re the Marriage of Ganger & LittleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. In re the Marriage of MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. In re the Marriage of BlivenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API