Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Neal

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 11, 2000No. 99-103PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT L. Brown, Justice.

This case involves the discipline ce. attorney, appellant Jimmie L. Wilson, where a majority of justices has been unable to agree on a single ground for reversal on the core issue of the proper sanction. Thus, the decision of the circuit judge is affirmed, and the opinions of this court have no precedential value.

The circuit judge determined that Mr. Wilson should be suspended from the practice of law for five years with credit given for the time he was previously disbarred from practice by this court. Two issues have been raised by Mr. Wilson in his appeal: (1) the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. James A. Neal v. Jimmie L. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  3. Wilson v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Carton v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  5. Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Davenport v. LeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Irvin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Neal v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Ligon v. PriceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. DeSoto Gathering Co. v. Hill ‎(16-990)‎Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API