Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Neal

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 5, 1998No. 96-1524PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imbbr, Justice.

Attorney Jimmie L. Wilson appeals the trial court’s order of summary judgment which disbarred him from the practice of law in Arkansas. We reverse and remand for a hearing to determine the appropriate sanction for Wilson’s violation of Model Rule of Professional Conduct 8.40).

In the words of Chief Judge Waters of the United States District Court, the procedural background of this case is “long and tortured,” Neal v. Wilson, 920 F. Supp. 976 (E.D. Ark. 1996), and it has been discussed in detail in three other opinions. See Neal v. Wilson, 112 F.3d 351 (8th Cir.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Stein v. LukasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. McGhee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. James A. Neal v. Jimmie L. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Barclay v. First Paris Holding Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Doe v. BaumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Board v. Pegasus Renovation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Neal v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. City of Barling v. Fort Chaffee Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API