Legal Opinion
Trapasso v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1977No. Civ. 17979PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUFMAN, J.
The trial court ordered the expungement of plaintiff’s lis pendens and the payment by plaintiff to defendant of $750 attorney fees on condition defendant post security in the amount of $50,000. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 409.4 1 plaintiff seeks review by petition for writ of mandate, naming defendant as real party in interest. For convenience, petitioner is referred to as plaintiff and real party in interest is referred to as defendant. All statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure unless otherwise indicated.
Plaintiff’s complaint alleges he…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Fuller v. LindenbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- United Professional Planning, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Graham v. GrahamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Castro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Moseley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Nash v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Stewart Development Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Committee for Responsible Planning v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.