Legal Opinion

Committee for Responsible Planning v. City of Indian Wells

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1989No. E006027PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DABNEY, J.

Appeal from order of the trial court denying a motion for relief from the conditions of a writ of mandate. The writ, issued under Government Code section 65755, 1 prohibits the City of Indian Wells (City) from issuing building permits, map approvals, and other discretionary land use approvals until the City brings its general plan into compliance with state law. On appeal, Monte Sereno Estates (Monte Sereno) contends that the facts before the trial court do not support its decision, the trial court applied an incorrect legal standard in determining Monte Sereno’s motion, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Denis Hanly v. Richard G. Kleindienst, as Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  5. Friends Of" B" Street v. City of HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Consaul v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Schaefer's Ambulance Service v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Hoffmaster v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Castanon v. Long Beach Lesbian etc. CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Consaul v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API