Trip-Tenn, Inc. v. Schultz
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Trip-Tenn, Inc. sued Russell and Sandra Schultz (collectively Schultz) for reformation of a contract for deed to collect unpaid principal and interest. The parties entered into the contract in 1977. A discrepancy in the amortization schedule was discovered in 1992. Trip-Tenn, however, did not commence suit until 1999, two years after Schultz claims the final payment on the contract was made. The trial court reformed the contract and awarded Trip-Tenn, Inc., a judgment of $30,955.73. We affirm, concluding the appropriate statute of limitation is the ten-year…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Wolff v. Secretary of the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks DepartmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- LPN Trust v. Farrar Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Knudsen v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Langer v. Stegerwald Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Hoven v. Banner Associates, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Second Century, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Owens v. FEM Electric Association, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Owens v. FEM Electric Association, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005