Legal Opinion

Langer v. Stegerwald Lumber Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1952PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The defendant raises the following contentions on this appeal:(1) That the defendant is entitled to show by parol testimony that the option to purchase was conditional upon the seller desiring to sell the property.

*385(2) That the evidence does not sustain the trial court’s finding that a mutual mistake was made as to the description.(3) That plaintiff did not properly .exercise the option to purchase because in his notice to exercise the option plaintiff used the original description contained in the lease.(4) That the cause of action for reformation is barred by the six-year statute of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beers v. Atlas Assurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. McCord v. HillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Cape v. Plymouth Congregational ChurchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Foster v. RoweWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Garage Equipment Manufacturing Co. v. DanielsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Plesko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Read v. McKennan HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Findorff v. FindorffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Froysland v. Leef Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  5. Sorce v. RinehartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API