Legal Opinion
Gilbert v. Homar
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 9, 1997No. 96-651PublishedCited by 738 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
This case presents the question whether a State violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by failing to provide notice and a hearing before suspending a tenured public employee without pay.
I
Respondent Richard J. Homar was employed as a police officer at East Stroudsburg University (ESU), a branch of Pennsylvania’s State System of Higher Education. On August 26, 1992, when respondent was at the home of a family friend, he was arrested by the Pennsylvania State Police in a drug raid. Later that day, the state police filed a criminal complaint charging respondent with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by738 opinions
- Otis Grant v. Trustees of Indiana UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- John D. Alvin v. Jon B. SuzukiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Leonard G. Tillman v. Lebanon County Correctional Facility Robert L. Raiger, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Argyropoulos v. City of AltonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Nnebe v. DausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
733 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.