Legal Opinion

Santana v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 10, 2007No. SC 17687PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiff, Alberto Santana, appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court in two consolidated actions. Santana v. Hartford, 94 Conn. App. 445, 448, 894 A.2d 307 (2006). In the first action, the plaintiff sought indemnification pursuant to General Statutes § 53-39a from the defendant, the city of Hartford (city), for costs incurred by him in defending against criminal charges he had allegedly committed in his capacity as a police officer. In the second action, the plaintiff raised several claims against the defendants, the chief of the…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Santana v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Santana v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Santana v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Provencher v. Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Biro v. MatzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  3. GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. GlennConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  4. Maio v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Robbins v. Physicians for Women's Health, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API