Legal Opinion
Arcadia Development Co. v. City of Morgan Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 16, 2008No. H032201PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, J.
I. Introduction
In 2004, voters in the City of Morgan Hill (City) passed a measure amending City’s general plan and extending to 2020 a growth control ordinance that had been set to expire in 2010. One provision of the original ordinance drastically restricted development of certain property within the city limits (the Density Restriction). The 2004 enactment did not change the effect of the Density Restriction other than to extend it for 10 years.
Arcadia Development Company (Arcadia), which owned property subject to the Density Restriction, filed a complaint and petition for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- County of Sonoma v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- California Public Records Research, Inc. v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Arcadia Development Co. v. City of Morgan HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Ventura Foothill Neighbors v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Aiuto v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.