Legal Opinion
Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 23, 2002No. 00-1167PublishedCited by 837 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The question presented is whether a moratorium on development imposed during the process of devising a comprehensive land-use plan constitutes a per se taking of property requiring compensation under the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution.1 This case actually involves two moratoria ordered by respondent Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (TRPA) to maintain the status quo while studying the impact of development on Lake Tahoe and designing a strategy for environmentally sound growth. The first, Ordinance 81-5, was effective from August 24, 1981, until August 26,1983, whereas the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by837 opinions
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gibson v. County of Washoe, NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cedar Point Nursery v. HassidSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Arkansas Game & Fish Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
832 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.