Legal Opinion
Aiuto v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 15, 2011No. A131279; No. A132908PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, P. J.
I
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs are owners of condominium units that are designated “Below Market Rate” (BMR units), and thus subject to restrictions imposed by the Below Market Rate Condominium Conversion Program (BMR Program) created by the City and County of San Francisco (the City), under authority of the state Subdivision Map Act (Gov. Code, § 66410 et seq.) (SMA).1 Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit against the City2 challenging ordinance No. 320-08 (the Ordinance) adopted by the City in December 2008 as part of its BMR Program. In their facial challenge, plaintiffs claim the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Costa Mesa City Employees' Ass'n v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- County of Kern v. T.C.E.F., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. v. Yee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- AIDS HealthCare Foundation v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Aiuto v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.