Legal Opinion

Abshir Abtidon Barrow v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 2015No. A13-1520PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Chief Justice.

Appellant Abshir Abtidon Barrow pleaded guilty to one count of third-degree sale of a narcotic drug, Minn.Stat. § 152.023, subd. 1(1) (2014), and was sentenced to 15 months in prison. The factual basis for Barrow’s plea was his admission that he gave cocaine to C.C., his wife, to hide when police officers pulled over the car in which he was a passenger. Barrow later filed a petition for postconviction relief, seeking to withdraw his guilty plea for lack of an adequate factual basis. Barrow argued in his petition that the statutory definition of “sell” requires the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. State v. TrottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. RaleighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Christianson v. HenkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MikulakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. State v. MikeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  5. Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API