Legal Opinion
Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 10, 2016No. A14-1186PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
In 2007, appellant Lane Francis Weitzel pleaded guilty and was convicted of one count of failure to register as a predatory offender in violation of MinmStat. § 243.166, subd. 5(a) (2014). In 2014, he filed a petition for postconviction relief under Minn.Stat. § 590.01 (2014), alleging his guilty plea was inaccurate and should be withdrawn in the interests of justice. The postconviction court denied the petition on the ground that it was untimely under Minn.Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(c). On appeal, Weitzel argued the postconviction court was required to consider his…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Wood v. MilyardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dikken v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Joel Armen Underwood, III. v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Halvorson v. B&F Fastener SupplySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Ricky Darnell Waiters, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, RespondentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.