Legal Opinion

Lane Francis Weitzel v. State of Minnesota

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 2016No. A14-1186Published

1Opinion of the Court

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A14-1186 Court of Appeals Dietzen, J. Concurring in part and dissenting in part, Gildea, C.J. and Anderson, J. Took no part, Chutich J. Lane Francis Weitzel, Appellant, vs. Filed: August 10, 2016 Office of Appellate Courts State of Minnesota, Respondent. ________________________ Cathryn Middlebrook, Chief Appellate Public Defender, Sharon E. Jacks, Assistant Public Defender, Kathryn J. Lockwood, Assistant Public Defender, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for appellant. Lori Swanson, Attorney General, Saint Paul, Minnesota; and, Anthony C. Palumbo, Anoka County…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Wood v. MilyardSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API