Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMONETT, Justice.
Does the “pollution exclusion” in the defendant carriers’ insurance policies exclude coverage for asbestos claims? We conclude in this case that it does not for the primary policies but it does for the excess policies. We reverse in part and affirm in part.
From 1969 to early 1972 the University of Minnesota installed asbestos-containing fireproofing materials, manufactured by Asbes-tospray Corporation, in some of its buildings. In 1985, the Board of Regents of the University and the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called “the Regents”) sued, among others, Asbestospray…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Just v. Land Reclamation Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Belleville Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Scottsdale Insurance v. Universal Crop Protection Alliance, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Midwest Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. WoltersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1997
- Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.